一盏灯
首页文章视频生词本复习
首页文章视频生词本我的

Companies Are Rewriting Return-to-Office Rules

大厂正在重写回办公室的规矩

通用商务新闻速读初级约 3 分钟场景 · return-to-office policy# 远程与混合办公# 管理与领导力

读完你能看懂公司发的返岗通知到底在说什么,也知道数据其实怎么讲:门禁刷卡量、离职率、混合办公的实验结果各是什么。更重要的是,你会拿到一套跟领导谈返岗安排的说法——用产出而不是喜好谈判,先问政策想解决什么问题,再给出你能接受的方案。

当前浏览器暂不支持语音朗读

The rules about working from home are changing again. Amazon told its office staff to come in five days a week from January 2025. JPMorgan Chase, Dell and Starbucks have made similar moves for their corporate teams. Very few of these companies call it the end of remote work. They call it a return to the way we worked before — and for many employees, that is exactly the problem.

关于在家办公的规矩,又变了。亚马逊要求办公室员工从 2025 年 1 月起每周到岗五天。摩根大通、戴尔和星巴克也对总部团队下了类似的通知。这些公司几乎没有一家承认这是远程办公的终结,它们的说法是『回到我们过去的工作方式』——而对许多员工来说,问题恰恰就在这句话里。

The numbers tell a calmer story than the headlines. Badge swipe data from the office security company Kastle Systems has sat near half of the level seen before 2020 for a long time. Research led by the Stanford economist Nicholas Bloom finds that American employees still work from home for about a quarter of their paid days, and that share has barely moved since 2023.

数字讲的故事,比标题冷静得多。办公楼安防公司 Kastle Systems 的门禁刷卡数据,长期停在 2020 年之前水平的一半左右。斯坦福经济学家 Nicholas Bloom 主持的研究发现,美国员工仍有大约四分之一的带薪工作日是在家完成的,而这个比例自 2023 年以来几乎没怎么变过。

So why do managers want people back? The reasons they give are almost always the same three. New staff learn faster when they can watch someone senior work. A decision that takes four messages online can take one minute in a corridor. And when a company is worried about performance, asking people to come in is a visible action a leader can take this month.

那么,管理者为什么想让人回来?他们给出的理由几乎永远是那三条。新人能亲眼看着资深同事怎么干活,学得更快;一个在线上要来回四条消息的决定,在走廊里一分钟就能定;而当一家公司对业绩感到焦虑时,让大家回办公室,是领导这个月就能做出的、看得见的动作。

The research is less certain than the memos. In a large trial at the Chinese travel company Trip.com, published in the journal Nature in 2024, engineers and marketers were randomly put on a hybrid schedule of three days in the office. Their output did not fall. What changed is that the number of people quitting dropped by about a third, and women and senior staff stayed longest.

研究的结论,可比那些通知含糊多了。中国旅游公司携程做过一次大规模实验,结果 2024 年发表在《自然》杂志上:工程师和市场人员被随机安排成每周到岗三天的混合模式。他们的产出并没有下降。真正变化的是离职人数下降了约三分之一,其中女性员工和资深员工留下来的时间最长。

Employees vote with their feet. Surveys keep finding that a large share of office workers would look for a new job if they lost their remote days. Some just show up, swipe the badge and leave again — a habit now called coffee badging. The cost is not shared equally either. Parents, carers, and people with long commutes or health conditions lose the most when one rule is fixed for everyone.

员工是用脚投票的。调查一次次发现,如果远程办公的天数被取消,相当大比例的白领会去找新工作。还有人干脆来一趟、刷个卡就走——这种做法如今被叫作『咖啡打卡』。而且代价并不是平摊的。真正损失最大的,是要带孩子的、要照顾家人的,以及通勤很久或有健康状况的人——当一条规矩对所有人一刀切时。

So a middle path is spreading quietly. Instead of counting days for the whole company, many teams now pick two anchor days when everyone is in, and leave the rest open. Office time gets saved for the things that are genuinely better in person: onboarding a new hire, running a workshop, having a difficult conversation. Quiet work goes home. The rule is set by the team, not by a badge report.

于是,一条中间路线正在悄悄铺开。很多团队不再由公司统一数天数,而是自己挑两个『固定到岗日』让全员碰面,其余时间自由安排。办公室的时间被留给那些确实面对面更好的事:带新人上手、开工作坊、进行一场难谈的对话。安静的活儿则拿回家做。规矩由团队定,而不是由一份刷卡报表定。

If your own company is rewriting its policy, argue with evidence rather than preference. Say what you deliver, not what you like: "I ship more on Tuesdays at home, and I will be in on Wednesday and Thursday for reviews." Ask what problem the policy is trying to solve, then offer a way to solve it that you can live with. Managers rarely change a rule for one person, but they often change how it is applied.

如果你所在的公司正在重写政策,请用证据去谈,而不是用偏好去谈。说你能交付什么,而不是你喜欢什么:『周二在家我的产出更高,周三周四我会到公司参加评审。』先问清楚这条政策想解决什么问题,再给出一个你自己也能接受的解法。领导很少会为某一个人改规矩,但他们经常会改规矩执行的方式。